If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
The Path of Redemption for Tiger Woods: Wise Words from Fr. Ed Beck
Posted using ShareThis
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
The Path of Redemption for Tiger Woods: Wise Words from Fr. Ed Beck
Posted using ShareThis
The first myth in the book, The Giving Myths, is this: “Give and you’ll get rich.” This may be the most insidious of all myths about giving. It’s the one primarily promoted by many radio and television ministers. It goes like this: “If you want to make $100,000 a year, give $10,000; if you wish to make a half-million a year, give $50,000; if you want to make a million, give $100,000″ and so on.
But, is this the way our charity works? Is it really automatic and guaranteed to bring a return? If you give, is the universe, or God, obligated to give to you in return? Many people, especially religious people, have been taught to believe so. Even Jesus said, “Give and you’ll receive.” And, the Prophet Malachi promised that if God’s people would bring their gifts to the Temple, the heavens would open and out would pour a blessing so abundant they could hardly contain it” (Malachi 3:8-12).
Many years ago, Sinclair Lewis wrote a novel about a character named Elmer Gantry. It was made popular as a motion picture in the 1960s and Burt Lancaster played the starring role as the infamous Elmer Gantry. Although a fictional character, Gantry was a charismatic, Midwestern, vacuum-cleaner salesman turned preacher in the 1920s. Isn’t it interesting that ministers today are often associated in the minds of people with manipulative salespeople? Gantry’s eloquence enabled him to prey on scores of people, but especially the timid, disturbed, and distraught. Not much has changed over the years.
Although many criticized Sinclair Lewis’ novel as unfairly judgmental of ministers, Lewis vividly portrayed a character virtually everyone has met at one time or another – a manipulative minister who not only loves the media and the popularity that comes with it, but the money as well. By making monstrous but meaningless promises to people that, if they will just be generous and give (which, of course, really means give to them), God will reward them abundantly. This is not only a lie, it is the worst sort of evil.
So, how does one reconcile the apparent contradictions found even in the teachings of Jesus who said, on one hand, “Give and it will be given to you, pressed down, running over…” (Luke 6:38); but, on the other hand, confessed that he himself had nowhere to lay his head and apparently was not always certain from where his next meal might come?” (Matthew 8:20).
While the fuller answer to this question is found in the book The Giving Myths, simply put, what looks like a contradiction and problem in Jesus’ own words is really one of the many paradoxes found not only in life but in many of Jesus’ teachings. For example, just as there are physical laws by which the universe operates, so there are spiritual laws. One of these spiritual laws is known in the New Testament as the Law of Giving and Receiving. In other religious traditions, such as Hinduism, it is simply known as the Law of Giving. Deepak Chopra deals with seven of the more common spiritual laws, the Law of Giving notwithstanding, in his easy-to-read book, The Seven Spiritual Laws of Success.
This law states that when you are generous and give of yourself, your talents, your resources, etc., you automatically tap into this universal spiritual law. The universe gratefully receives your generosity and returns it to you.
But, as with anything, what’s good can be made into something evil. And, many media ministers have done so. When one of them, or anyone else for that matter, attempts to manipulate what is a beautiful spiritual law for his or how own gain, not only is the law interrupted in its operation, but the consequences can be devastating. There are many people today, for example, who have turned away from religion because some ministerial monster of the media took advantage of them. Inspired perhaps by something the minister said and persuaded that, if they would just send him or her a financial gift, they would receive in return everything that they need, they do so. But, when their gift brings nothing but greater financial difficulty, they turn away in disbelief and distress.
Is the minister to blame for making promises to people just to motivate them to give? Of course. Is the giver at fault for making a gift chiefly for the purpose of getting something in return? Perhaps so, too. The point is, one’s motives in giving or receiving can interfere with the natural spiritual law of giving and receiving.
The best kind of generosity is that which springs spontaneously from a grateful, generous heart – a gift you give with no thought for what might come to you in return. This kind of generosity the universe, or God, responds to favorably.If you’re interested in exploring this topic more in depth, it is covered in depth, along with six other myths about giving, in the book, The Giving Myths.
When will this madness stop? What else could I say or write? View the Top Ten Pat Robertson Gaffes from Time Magazine. Time is a funny thing. You forget many things until something triggers your memory. I had forgotten all of these “gaffes” of this infamous religious leader. But, when you see them all together, how could anyone have any confidence in anything Robertson ever says?
I pray for the day when the religious community, the Christian community notwithstanding, will stop the insanity of labeling, judging, and condemning. That’s part of my motivation for my blogging about such matters and invite your conversation around many such topics affecting the spiritual journey that is our brief journey on earth.
Recently, three unrelated stories appeared in the news. Yet, they seemed somehow interconnected by a reality shared by everyone. The first story was that of Mark McGwire making his tearful confession that he had in fact used steroids over a ten-year period and, not ironically, right during the time (1998) when he broke Roger Maris’ single-season record, hitting seventy homeruns. The admission surprised no one. Few things do anymore, with the exception of perhaps Tiger Woods. It seems his admission surprised many of us. The newspaper headline bore McGwire’s admission, “I wish I had never used steroids.”
The second and third stories were buried deeper in the paper. One was that of the verbal gaffe by Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader from Nevada. As have many others, it seems Reid has had to learn the hard way, that anything you say, write, or do will find its way to the web or, in this case, to the printed page and to the web. The passing comment he made during the last presidential election that Obama was “a light skinned African American with no Negro dialect,” was not only an antiquated thing to say but, frankly, a little surprising coming from him. The headline bore his confession, “I wish I had never said that.”
The third story was about the arrogant antics of the basketball star, Gilbert Arenas. Just weeks after signing a six-year, $111 million dollar contract with the Washington Wizards, a reporter spotted guns hidden in his locker. His initial response to the reaction of the Commissioner was anything but adult-like. But, when the Commissioner suspended the rich player without pay, and that suspension was soon followed by felony charges for carrying a gun without a license, one can’t help but wonder if Arenas’ is not sitting somewhere and thinking, “I wish I had not done this.”
When reading or watching such news stories, it’s pretty easy to get critical, judgmental, and sort of wag one’s head in arrogant disbelief. But if you think about it, who of us has not done things, said things, or acted in ways that we’ve later regretted?
I was sitting on a plane when reading these headlines. I leaned over to share my air of pretense, judgment, and superiority with the fellow seated beside me. “Did you read these stories about McGwire, Reid, and Arenas?” Just as I did, however, I remembered the time when I was a junior in high school. One of my friends and I not only smoked pot on a fairly regular basis, but we operated a small business out of his bedroom closet. It was there that we stashed our grass and sold nickel bags to our friends and acquaintances. Neither of us got rich over it and, as I recall, our illegal business went south within weeks. I think he smoked most of our profits. Or, maybe it was me who did.
May not seem like a big deal now but, back then, had we gotten caught, the authorities would have slapped it to us, and that after the church community (for which both of us were active members) had burned us at the stake.
You say, “There’s still no comparison between your story and these others!” You think? Oh sure, the circumstances are different; the scope of the offenses, too. But, the attitudes behind the offenses? I suspect there isn’t much difference.
A question on the minds of millions of followers of Christianity is why the Christian church has been declining. There are a myriad of reasons. Here are a couple of my own observations and suggestions for turning it around.
The most obvious reason is sheer disgust with a religious system, as someone put it, “that would condemn homosexuals for coming out of their closet while hiding clergy pedophiles in its own.”
Others are leaving because they no longer wish to be associated with a religion swallowed up in its own judgmentalism. The church preaches love, tolerance, and acceptance of all people but, in actual practice, it loves, tolerates, and accepts only those who conform to its dogmas and standards of morality. Religious bigotry and intolerance, as well as the more common practices of judgmentalism and condemnation may be more prevalent among Christians today than at any other time in history. But, ironically, Jesus himself said, “Judge not.”
Here’s a poignant example of the kind of judgmentalism that is a scourge on the Christian church today.
I know a married couple who once were very active in the church. Today, however, they rarely, if ever, attend. Although they still consider themselves to be believers, the church is no longer the place they turn for guidance in their spiritual journey.
I have this feeling there may be scores of Christian people just like them. They view the church as this mammoth, inflexible monolith that no longer provides them guidance on their journey or spiritual nourishment along the way. They’re not at war with the church or in protest against it. Instead, they have just quietly disappeared. If asked why, they would give many different reasons but, among them, would be their frustration that the church is obsessed with labeling and judging people who do not conform to or fit in with its narrow view of the world.
Here are the specifics related to this couple’s story.
Each was previously married and divorced and both were nearing mid-life when they met. They were instantly attracted to each other, began dating, and, before long, fell in love. A few months into their relationship, he proposed to her and the two of them made plans to be married. At long last, the wedding date drew near.
They attended several different churches in their hometown in hopes of finding one they could join and attend together. After visiting several, they found a church they liked and, one Sunday, they joined. To request membership in this church required that they walk forward during the invitation time at the close of one of its many weekend worship services. It was a mega-church with thousands attending each weekend.
They did as they were expected and walked forward. They were met at the altar by a minister who warmly welcomed them and then just as quickly handed them off to a church counselor. He led them out of the sanctuary, down a long hallway to a large, brightly lit room where others like them and their assigned counselors were gathering.
After a few brief words by the person whom they presumed to be the lead counselor, they were then separated. Each was paired to a personal counselor whose job it was to determine the candidate’s Christian experience and readiness to join the church. While he was guided by one counselor into a small room, a different counselor guided her to a room across the hall. Given they were intimidated already by the size of this church and its well-rehearsed operation, the separation was more than a little unnerving.
Later that day, as they shared their individual perceptions to each other, it was obvious to them that the counselors had been well coached. Each asked the very same questions, beginning with the expected ones—name, address, phone, and so forth. But then, the questions became more personal and more difficult. “Tell me about your Christian experience?” “When did you join a church?” “What kind of church was it?” “Did they believe the Bible?” “Have you been baptized?” “Was your baptism ‘believer’s baptism’?” “Was it by immersion or were you just sprinkled?” “What are your spiritual gifts?” “Where do you see yourself serving in and through this church?” The whole thing was surprising to them, even a little offensive, but they persevered, deciding to blow it off since they were just glad it was over. They had a church home and that was their objective all along.
A few days later, however, everything changed—and, for the worse. She arrived at her home from work earlier than usual and fetched the day’s mail. Buried in the carnage of junk mail was a letter addressed to both of them. She could tell it was not a form letter since there was no label and a real stamp on the envelope. She opened it and looked first at who is was from. She did not recognize the name but, how could she? It was a large church and there were as many ministers and staff as employees of the church as there are total members in other churches.
Assuming it was a welcome letter, she began to read. What she read, however, was anything but welcoming. She was shocked, embarrassed, hurt, even angered. The ego in her reacted in self-defense. She slammed the letter on the kitchen counter, reached for the phone and dialed her fiancé. “Get over here now,” she demanded. “Why,” he asked, hearing the anger in her voice. “What’s the matter?”
“Just get over here,” she said with no explanation.
He left his apartment across town and drove hurriedly to her house. When he arrived, she shoved the letter in his chest and said, “Here, read this.” But, before he could unfold the letter, she blurted out, “Did you give the counselor who questioned you my home address as if it were your address?”
“Well, yes,” he explained, “but what does that matter?”
“Well,” she explained, “they think we’re living together.”
“But,” he defended himself, “I didn’t think anything of it. I just figured, since I’d be moving in after the wedding, I should give them your address instead of mine.”
They debated the incident over dinner and wondered how they should respond. Their first impulse was to call the church leaders and demand an explanation, as well as an apology. But, the more they thought about it, the more convinced they became, not only of the unjust nature of the letter, but that they had nothing to explain and nothing to defend.
“Who appointed them our judges?” they reasoned to themselves. “Besides, we’re not two irresponsible teens, so what business is it of theirs whether we’re living together or not?”
They concluded the assumptions made by church leaders were ill-informed and inexcusable. But, instead of defending themselves or retaliating, they decided it would be best to ignore the letter altogether and move on. In this respect, the couple acted more maturely than the ministers themselves.
This attitude of moral superiority is common in churches today and it is insane. Only a church confused about its real purpose would engage in such hypocritical and hypercritical nonsense. Given the church’s own sordid and unremitting history of immorality and moral failure, it is hardly justified in setting itself up as anyone else’s judge. But, this how the collective ego works and, until churches and church leaders become aware of this, they will continue the madness of pointing out the toothpick in another’s eye, as Jesus put it, while failing to see the two-by-four in their own.”
For more on this subject, visit my blog.
The Christian Church has not only penetrated the world but it has splintered into at least 20,000 different subsets. Today, each subset regards its beliefs, its understanding of truth, to be just a little more right than that of 19,999 others.
This is part of the reason many are abandoning the church. They have concluded that the continual disagreement and fighting within every branch of Christianity is neither profitable nor necessary. For these Christ-followers, the “what” about Jesus is not nearly as important as the “way” Jesus provided for knowing the Ineffable Reality. To know God and to walk in the joy of his presence is all that is important to them.
It would be a misreading of my analysis here to assume I am suggesting that all who leave the church today walk in light of God’s presence. It would be equally incorrect to assume I am suggesting all who stay in the church remain in darkness. I only mean that, if you wish to know why multitudes are leaving the church but not leaving their faith, it is because they have moved on from the pervasive madness found in most churches. They wish to keep it simple. They wish only to do as Jesus himself said, “Come, follow me.”[1] Nothing more. Nothing else. But, nothing less.
The activities and programs, as well as the personnel and financial resources required to keep them going, are gargantuan in number and complexity. They demand more and more time and attention. It is not that any of these programs are harmful or do not serve a worthy purpose. But, the fact is, there is far too much going on in today’s church. So much so, in fact, if a spiritual seeker is not very careful, the attention he or she must give to the plethora of programs competing for a slice of his or her time ends up sucking the spiritual life from their soul. For many, it has already. They’ve grown weary of having no life, especially no spiritual life, outside of churchgoing. They feel empty, exhausted, and bereft of any sense of the Eternal Presence.
Churches today boast of being a 24/7 operation as if that’s something to brag about. It’s really a warning signal to any serious spiritual seeker. “Do not pass ‘GO’ or you’ll forfeit even your spiritual life!” Instead of finding communion with the Creator, most seekers find only a cauldron of endless and exhausting activity.
The healthiest and most spiritual thing a church might do is to permanently shut down the majority of the time-consuming and energy-draining madness that goes on. The busy-ness in most churches today has nothing to do with the business of the church—which, again, is simply to serve as a guide in the quest to know God.
Instead of the church being a sanctuary into which people might enter to find quietude, reflection, and inspiration, the church has become a theatrical stage filled with noise and nonsense. Instead of encountering the Sacred and Mysterious through solitude and stillness, church leaders have conditioned people to expect entertainment—and, it had better be better than the competition down the street. Churches actually compete with each other for members. This is because the overwhelming majority of them are not reaching the ever-growing, unchurched population, so they have to compete for the few that remain.
The church has developed its own version of “Entertainment Tonight.” You don’t have to be a statistician to know why mega-churches, as they’re called, are about the only churches in America showing an increase in attendance. They are, but it is more likely because they can afford to pay for the best talent and the most professional “dog and pony show” in town. I mean, think about it. Who wants to watch a show on a ten-inch, black-and-white screen when the theatre down the street has one in 3-D, on an I-Max screen, and served up with a Cappuccino?
I have a feeling the day will come, and there are signs it is emerging already,[3] when people will tire of the hype, the noise, and the emotionally-charged, superficial highs generated by religious professionals and their performances. People need substance, something more than a weekly fix that stimulates the emotions but does little to feed the soul. They’re looking for Presence because it is only ever a deep and abiding connection to God that people really need.
If church leaders are motivated more by having the biggest crowds and the loudest applause, more by ratings and recognition and other egoic ambitions, they should not be surprised when people eventually look elsewhere for God. Some have, and many others will. There are indications many Christians have grown weary of the madness and are turning in great numbers to other religions to find what Christianity or, more accurately, the church’s version of Christianity, has failed to give them.
This egoic notion among clerics that numerical growth is a sign of God’s favor is as much an illusion as church decline is a sign of God’s disfavor. A more telling sign is whether anyone is coming to know the transformative presence of God—a Presence that changes how people feel about themselves, how they treat others but especially their enemies, and the care and concern they show for creation itself. When being Christian is more about loyalty to an institution, or to a peculiar way of believing, than it is about a relationship with God, people will eventually walk away from such a church, either emotionally, physically, or both.
In short, American Christianity is as bigoted, busy, and misguided as the religious system Jesus encountered two thousand years earlier. Fortunately, people are discovering, due largely to the church’s failure, as well as the rise of other religions in U.S., that Christianity is neither the only way to know God nor the only way to find and enjoy a worthwhile and fulfilling human existence.
Having said all of this, you might think I have something against the church. But, I really don’t. I’ve given my life to its work and ministry. I am not ready to give up on Christianity, either. To the contrary, I know that, at the core of the Christian faith, there is a pathway that will guide any person who wishes to be connected to God into a transformative experience of Divine grace. I also know there are some churches and church leaders who not only understand the real purpose of Christianity, but seek to stay with it and to shape a church life around it. The church my wife and I call our spiritual home is just such a place to us.
[2] John 17:16
[3] Read the following report by The Barna Group “Americans are Exploring New Ways of Experiencing God,” June 8, 2009 The Barna Group, Ltd. http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/270-americans-are-exploring-new-ways-of-experiencing-god.
EzineArticles.com Author’s Area.
Recently, my wife and I saw the movie 2012. It reminded me of the doomsday nonsense that fundamentalist Christians (and I was once one of them) have been saying about the RAPTURE – the return of Jesus to catch-up all his followers into the clouds and whisk them away to a kind of benign judgment while those LEFT BEHIND reel in the madness of a world that spirals out of control – necessitating the appearance of an Antichrist who rules the world.
What do they have in common? Both are fiction and for entertainment purposes only.
There two fundamental reasons why the Christians and Christian leaders become rigid and narrow in their beliefs, separated from others and the world, and develop a neurotic obsession with future events. First, the church has failed in fulfilling its mission. Furthermore, the longer this failure is denied, the closer to radical fundamentalism these churches and their followers become. If the church’s failure is not faced, and very, very soon, the church will continue its present spiral downward and become more isolated, marginalized, and eccentric in its beliefs, as well as more violent than it is already toward perceived enemies.
Already, there is very little difference between radical, Islamic fundamentalism in the Middle East and some branches of Christianity in the U.S. The only real difference is in the methods each uses to express displeasure toward a world—a world each has failed to convert to its own way of thinking and living. The former use weapons, the latter use words. Some Christians would prefer to use weapons, too, and, were it not for the laws in this land that forbid it, they likely would.
So, instead, it has been the history of these radical little egos to turn to the government to give them the world their evangelical efforts have failed to create. Over the years, church and church leaders have sought to influence government to take action against its perceived enemies. I recently read in The Christian Post that, among all the varied interests groups in the U.S., the one group most supportive of the war in Iraq or, at a minimum, interested in a continued military presence there, are the Christians.
A second reason for the rigidity in beliefs, the separateness from the world, and the obsession of the church with future world events is that the collective church ego feeds on fear. Since Christians are afraid the world is out-of-control, their appetite for prophecies pertaining to the end of the world is voracious. The appetite is most prevalent whenever there is moral unrest, as well as social, political, and international discord and tension. That is to say, there is a direct correlation between the degree of moral chaos and political unrest in the world and the frequency with which churches and church leaders talk about the end of the world, especially in terms of the Rapture and the Second Coming of Jesus.
The Rapture is a belief system about how human history will end. At its core, it proponents believe that believers in Jesus, or the church, will be “raptured,” or snatched up from the surface of the earth and gathered together in the clouds, just prior to the Great Tribulation and the rise of the Antichrist. What “Rapturist” proponents do not tell you, however, most likely because they do not know, is that the Rapture is not taught anywhere in Bible.
Nowhere. Nada. The only vague reference to anything remotely close to the idea of Rapture is found in Saint Paul’s Letter to the Thessalonians. But there Saint Paul is trying to reassure people that they were eternal, since most of them had grown up in a world that had little or no confidence in an afterlife.
Given the preoccupation of people in the west with thoughts about and a belief in an afterlife, it is impossible to imagine living in a culture that did not believe in such things. But, this was the situation Saint Paul addresses. His purpose in writing these words was to reassure the Thessalonian followers of Jesus that there is life beyond this one.
Apart from this purpose, however, the differences in interpretations about future events, known as eschatology, as well as the type and timing of those events, quickly morphs into an incomprehensible pattern of nonsense. There are those, for example, who are known as Pre-millennialists, others who are Post-millennialists, and still others who identify themselves as Amillennialists.
But, even this only scratches the surface of eschatological conjecture. Among the Pre-millennialists, there are Historic Pre-millennialists and Dispensational Pre-millennialists. And, if that were not confusing enough, among the Dispensational Pre-millennialists, there are Progressive Dispensational Pre-millennialists as well as the Pre-Tribulation Dispensational Pre-millennialists.
It’s confusing. It’s nonsense. And, it is insane.
How to Know God? Here’s how?
1. Start from the assumption that you know God already. The fact is, you do. You came from Intelligence, you will return to the same. Don’t make knowing God into a problem. For most of us raised in some kind of religious tradition, so much over the years has been layered over this basic, innate and inner knowledge we have of the Divine, that we are programmed to think there’s something we must do, say, know and so forth, in order to know God. Not so. You know God already. Start here.
2. Let your religious beliefs enrich your knowledge. But, guard against the beliefs becoming more important than that toward which they point. Beliefs are signs that point beyond themselves. They’re like a finger that points to the moon. Don’t confuse the finger for the moon. And, by all means, don’t worship the finger.
3. Go within. Christians call it prayer. Easterners call it meditation. Call it whatever you wish but the objective is the same. Go within and there you’ll find God. Jesus called it the Kingdom of God. The Kingdom of God isn’t the church. It isn’t some future place we go once this journey ends. The Kingdom is Now and it is, as Jesus said, “within you.” (Luke 17:20).
4. “How do I go within?” you ask. There are scores of great books on meditation. Go into any Barnes & Nobel, Borders, Books-a-Million and find the section on “Religions and Spirituality.” Any of the books written by Lama Surya Das or Pema Chodron could be helpful. But, more importantly, just start where you are. For me, I use my recliner. I don’t go all the way back in it because I’m likely to fall asleep. But, I relax, close my eyes, and begin to focus on my breath or breathing. Thoughts come, of course. So, I work on (but I do not struggle against) the incessant invasion of thoughts. I do so by acknowledging them when they appear and then letting them go. I return my attention to breathing and almost certainly to the rhythms and beats of my heart. It takes discipline but the objective is to reach of state of complete calm – thoughtlessness. Some days are more successful than others. But, every day, as I practice this technique for about twenty to thirty minutes, I emerge feeling completely at peace and in touch with myself, with God.
5. It will work for you, too. Don’t concern yourself so much with which religion is right. Instead, recognize the spritual truth inherent in all of them. I, for one, grew up in a Christian home and became myself a Christian minister. For years, I believed you could not know God apart from believing in the tenets of the Christian faith. I no longer believe this way and in my book, The Enoch Factor, I describe in detail the life experiences that brought me to this conclusion. If you’d like a copy of this book, send me an email: steve@stevemcswain.com. I’ll put you on a waiting list and notify you when the book is scheduled to hit the bookshelves and stores. If you’d like a free PDF chapter now, I’d be happy to send that now. Again, just email me and I’ll take it from there.
6. Remember, there is no “way” to know God. God IS the way. Just accept this. Again, don’t make a problem out of it or bring a set of expectations with you as to what “knowing God” is supposed to feel like, be like, and so forth. Just accept your Divine acceptance. Good feelings will follow – eventually. But, don’t confuse the feeling with God. God feels good, to be sure, but God is always more than a feeling. So, don’t succumb to the temptation of boxing God into a certain feeling.
7. Finally, do not be the proverbial fish who swims in the ocean in search of the sea. Know that you know God already. Accept this. This is what the Bible means by grace. While you may have grown up in religious tradition that leave you always feeling as if you’re not quite there yet, that there’s something still missing from your life, know that the real truth is, nothing is missing and there’s nothing to do. Just be. It is by being that you find yourself merged into Being itself. In other words, there is nothing you need to do in order to know God. You know God already. This is a cause for celebration.
So, what are you waiting for?
Don’t forget. Write me. Follow me on Twitter. I want to hear from you. Send an email to steve@stevemcswain.com.
Blessed Knowing.
Do you remember how you responded to the tragedy of 9/11? I remember my response. Like virtually everyone else, I was shocked and deeply saddened by the unimaginable horror that unfolded on what was an otherwise blue-sky day in New York City. Daily, I wondered what the victims must have felt as well as their families. Each time I thought about the event, I grew angrier toward those who had perpetrated this evil. I even felt hatred and disgust toward them. I wanted the people responsible to not only be caught and quickly tried, but I wanted them to suffer for their evil. No mercy, justice only, saturated with retribution. They deserved nothing less, or so I believed.
The ego in me fed on such thoughts of offense and revolt and the retribution both demanded. Every time I heard Toby Keith sing the lyrics to his song, “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue,” I raised a fist of agreement and joined the fight club.
The ego in me was scared. The thought that attacks of a similar nature might occur anytime in the future was more overwhelming than I could tolerate. So, it pleased me when government officials began looking for somebody or some country to punish for our pain. Their actions gave my desire for vengeance a temporary reprieve.
I now realize that one of the main reasons why most of us in the U.S., including most churches and church leaders, wanted to believe, in spite of evidence to the contrary, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was because the ego in all of us was reeling from the blow of 9/11. We wanted blood to spill for this horrific deed. So, when high ranking officials said that weapons were in Iraq, most of us did not question their haste to go to war. It was as if we were looking for any reason to feed our own egoic appetite for revenge. We were even willing to risk the lives of our daughters and sons, as well as the reputation of our nation in the eyes of the world, in the hope that, after launching an assault, we would eventually find the weapons. We never did.
Ego has two objectives. The first, as we have seen already, is to edge God out. The second is to enthrone itself. It wants power, supremacy, and security, and it will do whatever is necessary to get it. In varying degrees, it will retaliate, or take a pre-emptive strike, on anyone or anything it perceives as a threat. Ego has no regard for anything or anyone. It has no regard for you, either, which is why the real demon in this world is not the character created by religious people—the cute and harmless caricature of evil in red suit with a pitch fork and horns. Satan is really the human ego, the demonic monster inside you and me.
When ancient religious people observed evil so unimaginable it defied explanation, they gave it a name—Satan, who also goes by the name, Devil. I prefer the name Ego, however. It’s a little harder to dismiss our culpability when you realize this little demon makes his home in your own mind.
But, of course, this Devil would much prefer that you give your attention, as most religious people do, to his benign and fictitious alter-ego. That way, the Ego-Demon is free to go about as a roaring lion, as Saint Peter warned, “seeking whom he may devour.”
Here’s how the ego in me responded to the events of 9/11.
For months after that act of violence against the U.S., I thought about it with as much frequency as it was reported in the news. The more I nursed the offense I felt (ego, ego, ego), the angrier and more frightened (or, the more un-Christlike or Christ-unconscious), I became. I looked with suspicion on anyone whose skin color made me think they might have ties to one of the countries around the Persian Gulf. I especially eyed with suspicion anyone wearing a thobe or kandura, garments frequently worn by Muslims.
I was so rattled by the whole damn thing I went out and bought a handgun. For a while, I felt better, even safer. But, after a few days, the fear returned. So, I went back to the gun dealer and bought another handgun, and then, a little later, another still. Before long, I owned three handguns and a high powered rifle with a scope. About this same time, Kentucky passed the Carry Concealed handgun law. I enrolled in one of the first classes of instruction. After a few sessions and an exam, I was awarded a license to carry a concealed weapon.
For weeks, I toted around a concealed handgun. After a while, however, the thrill of it, as well as the illusory sense of security it provided, faded away. It’s not a little ironic to me that, as I am writing this part of the book, I saw a story today on the front page of our morning paper. It’s about the on-going debate in our city over churches and church members who have been carrying concealed weapons to church. What insanity!
Due to the recent rash of shootings across the U.S. in congregations at worship, there has been a heightened sense of alarm and fear. So, unaware of how the ego responds to threats, some religious people have devised a way to hide the fear the little me in them is feeling behind lofty debates over Constitutional issues. One minister expressed the sentiments of many of these frightened Christians by saying the Second Amendment right to bear arms is a “God-given right.”
A “God-given right?” Can you imagine a greater egoic delusion? I had to laugh to keep from crying! I’m sure he spends most of his time in the Old Testament because he could not be a follower of Jesus and justify anything so absurd.
As I have read the blogs this morning around this news story, I found the following strangely ironic. It is the self-described non-churchgoing bloggers who seem more aware of Jesus’ teaching than the Christians themselves. These bloggers are reminding the frightened, little egos of what they should know themselves. Jesus held to a vastly different view than is held by most Christians today. Check out…
• Jesus’ view of violence of any kind;
• Jesus’ view as to how to treat a “perceived” enemy; and,
• Jesus’ view as to the fate of those who choose to “live by the sword.”
This is why Jesus admonished those who would pursue his path to “take up the cross,” which is just another way of saying, “to die to all attachments,” including the attachment to one’s own egoic need for survival and protection.
If you have died already, what would you need to protect?
Jesus said, “Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” The “…him which is able to destroy the body and the soul”…who is that? By now, you should know it is the ego.
Hell is the world here,
Wherein liveth a little monster, Fear.
I’m not normally so poetic; but, that’s a pretty good verse, if you ask me.
I had reclined on the living room couch, picked up the remote, and began surfing the plethora of television programs, most of which are repetitive and useless. I paused from channel-surfing just long enough to listen to the opening remarks of a popular psychologist on a PBS special. His name? Wayne W. Dyer. Though I knew of him only vaguely, I remembered he was the author of several bestselling books and one in particular that had propelled him to a level of notoriety few authors ever attain. You might recall the book was Your Erroneous Zones.
I can remember when it was first released back in the late seventies. Though it got a lot of press then, I refused to read it. As a young theologian doing graduate work at what was once a highly regarded seminary, I had judged Dyer’s book, as had many others I think, as a sleazy book on sex. The title was a dead give-away. Not until several years later did I realized I had misjudged the book entirely. It was not a book about sex at all.
The first time I saw the book up-close-and-personal, my family and I were having lunch after church one Sunday in the home of a prominent church member. On her living room coffee table was a copy of Dyer’s book. I thought to myself, ―Why would our luncheon host be reading a book about sex? Surely, she’s more spiritual than that.‖ The irony in all of this that the real subject matter of the book is how to overcome some of the more common hang-ups we have in life—like that of judging people and situations, and both too quickly, before having all the facts.
On the Sunday afternoon PBS special, Dyer’s subject matter seemed benign enough. So, I decided to give him half a chance. I listened intently for several minutes. Many of the things he said seemed sensible, even applicable to one’s life. But, that’s about all I can say, because the
funny part to me is this: Now, I can’t recall a single thing he said. That’s not saying anything about his subject matter, but it’s saying everything about my readiness for what transpired next.
Sometime during the special, although I don’t remember when, an intense peace invaded my consciousness. I’ve carefully chosen each of these descriptive words. ―Intense‖ peace may sound like a contradiction. But, what I mean is, the unfathomable and profound calmness that swept over me was like nothing I had ever felt before. The living room itself took on a kind of surreal sense, too. It was as if I was in the room but not in the room at the same time. What’s more, this peace pervaded my consciousness. By that I mean, it was sudden, unanticipated and, therefore, outright surprising. I had not been praying for peace. I had not been searching for some assurance that my life mattered, either. In fact, I think I had resigned to living with a pretty cynical view of my own life as well as this world. But, instantly, the awareness of peace and purpose filled my consciousness. Nothing seemed negative, accidental, or wrong with either with me or with this world.
I have said it was joy I felt most profoundly but maybe it was gratitude I was feeling or a blend of the two. It’s really hard to explain. I do know it was not the laughter kind of joy, the kind you have after somebody’s told you a really funny joke or after you’ve had one too many drinks. It was just extreme joy and appreciation, not for anything in particular but everything in general. I don’t know how else to say it.
With the joy and peace came an inexplicable awareness of Life itself. This part is most difficult to explain. Whatever I say seems only to diminish some of the profundity of the experience. The few times I have tried to describe to others what happened to me, I get this feeling people are looking at me as if I’m Rod Sterling on a return trip from The Twilight Zone.
But, here goes it, anyway.
It lasted only a minute or two, perhaps a little longer. I can’t be sure. No matter how long it was, however, it was as if I entered a no-time zone, a kind of time warp or something. I became immediately aware of two dimensions of reality, the world I could see and the world I could not see. There was an awareness of the room around me and the objects in the room. But, I was also aware of another dimension, a kind of emptiness. That is to say, I became aware of nothing. There were no objects in this awareness but it felt to me just as real, maybe more so, than the material dimension or the room around me with walls and furniture and so forth.
Call it a glimpse of the spiritual world, if you will. That would be as good as anything I could come up with. But, I really don’t know what to call it. I just became aware, not only of the objects I could see around me, but of the emptiness out of which those objects appeared. In that awareness, I felt all of the things I’ve described already—intense joy, peace, love, security, and so on. But, even more significant this, I felt Presence in this emptiness. I know that makes no sense, but I have no other way of saying it.
Have you ever looked up into the heavens on a clear night and tried counting the stars or identifying the constellations? It has always been one of my favorite pastimes. So, while this may sound strange to you, ever since the transformation, I have found myself more attracted, even connected, to the nothingness that is our heavens. That infinite vastness of space without which no objects would appear.
For years, for example, I could look up into the heavens, and did so often, but all I would ever see was the stuff scattered throughout the heavens—the stars, the planets, the constellations, and so on. To do so was amazing to be sure. But, as awesome as it was and still is, it pales in comparison to what I now see. Since the transformation, whenever I look into the heavens, I see
infinity of Emptiness, Nothingness, or one could call it, Stillness. It’s as if, on that Sunday afternoon, I was given the gift of seeing everything in nothing.
The psalmist said, ―The heavens declare the glory of God.‖1
With all due respect to the psalmist, the heavens declare very little about God. You cannot look into the heavens and see God or every disbeliever in Divine Intelligence would become a believer. In fact, the opposite is most often the case. Those who seriously study the universe often become atheists or agnostics. In a recent report of The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, in collaboration with the American Association for the Advancement of Science, only a third of all scientists today even believe in God.2
Furthermore, if the heavens actually declared God’s glory, then everyone who believes in God would actually know God and be conscious of the Divine Presence. But, as it was with me, most believing people who say they believe in God only rarely ever feel connected or close to God. For me, the remarkable discovery I made was this: it was only I could see seeing nothing that Everything seemed to emerge.
This is why I find it bizarre whenever a person attempts to prove God exists, as do Christian apologists, as they are known. To me, it is just as futile to argue for God’s existance as it is to argue for the non-existence of God. On one hand, it is the admission by the Christian apologist that he’s unaware of the Reality he seeks to prove. It is an admission by the atheist, on the other hand, he is unaware of the Reality he seeks to disprove. You only try to prove or
1 Psalm 19:1
2 “Scientific Achievements Less Prominent than Decade Ago: Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public/Media,” Survey conducted by The Pew Research Center for the People and the Pew in collaboration with the American Association for the Advancement of Science, with commentary by Dr. Alan I. Leshner, CEO. For more information or a copy of the report contact Andrew Kohut, Director and Scott Keeter, Director of Survey Research at 202-419-4350 or visit http:///www.people-press.org.
disprove that which, in either case, you do not know. Christian apologists, as they are known, have done more to damage the cause of Christianity than they’ve ever done to advance the cause.
Here is the real truth:
It is only after looking into the heavens and seeing Nothing that No-Thing becomes Everything to you;
It is only after looking into the eyes of somebody whom the world says is a nobody that you see and know the Everybody in all living things; and,
It is only after you can sit in a room, as it were, surrounded by walls and furniture, carpet and curtains—or, objects in awareness—and, simultaneously be aware of the space around them, that the Empty Space itself becomes the Eternal Source to you.
When this is what you see, then you will understand and know for yourself what happened to me on that Sunday afternoon.
Buddhists would call my experience a satori. Well, if that’s what this was, then maybe I haven’t lost my mind. But, even if I have, I’ll take this insanity any day over the kind I lived in for nearly three decades. This has been, and continues to be, infinitely more wonderful than anything I’ve ever known before. I woke up to Life and have remained so ever since. This is why the word awakening seems to come closer than any other in capturing the essence of what happened to me. It was sacred experience, too, an unexpected instant of profound insight and awareness, and more hallowed than any I had ever known in church.
Yet, the whole thing is a bit comical, too. Right after it happened, for example, the first thought I had was, ―How will I tell anybody about this?‖
I wanted to tell someone. It was too splendid to keep to myself. Yet, it was too ordinary in the way it transpired, too.
―Why couldn’t this have been more spectacular?‖ I thought to myself.
Most of the really great religious leaders, Divine avatars, spiritual masters and teachers had their satori in the midst of a great crisis of suffering or during some horrific tragedy or drama.
Take Saint Paul, for example. His satori came with blinding lights and strange voices on his way to Damascus where he had planned to make more trouble for early followers of Christ.3
It was during the Hindu-Muslim conflict in Calcutta, India, 1946, a conflict that brought unprecedented bloodshed, starvation, and death that Mother Teresa had ―her call within the call,‖ as she later described it. That moment of intense suffering transformed not only her life but its direction, its focus. The rest of her story is a history known by virtually everyone.
In his quest to find the meaning of life, and freedom from suffering, The Buddha himself left his royal life and became a mendicant instead. For years, he lived on the edge of society, nearly starving on several occasions as he fed off the scraps of kindness people tossed his way. Only after six rigorous years as an ascetic did he finally attain Enlightenment.
And, who doesn’t know the story of Jesus’ own wilderness struggles for forty days and forty nights?4
So, against this backdrop of dramatic spiritual awakenings, I sat on a living room couch, holding a remote in one hand, a drink in the other, and half asleep during a PBS special on television. Hardly a hallowed setting for a holy satori!
I saw no bright lights. The earth beneath me did not shake. And, I heard no strange or loud voices, either. Instead, a quiet stillness slipped into the room like a cat without notice. But, as it did, I woke up. In an instant, I was more aware of my surroundings than I had ever been before. What’s more, the space or emptiness within the room was just as alive to me as the
3 Acts 9:3ff
4 Matthew 4:1-11
objects in it. Out of that space of awareness, I sensed a Presence nearer than the air itself. In fact, it was as if, when I breathed, I was absorbing the very Emptiness that surrounded me.
I admit it was strange, but it’s even stranger to try and explain to someone else. In that moment, I knew that, no matter what happened in this world, or what happened to me, everything would be O.K. That my life, my family, indeed, everything in this world was just as it was supposed to be. Nothing was missing and everything would be provided at just the right time. Since then, this knowing has fluctuated with intensity but it has always been with me.
This was a new way of thinking for me because, for much of my life, I had felt as if nothing was right in this world and that nothing was right about my life, either. I had not only made many mistakes but, sometimes, I felt as if I was the mistake. And, as far as the world goes…well…I thought it sucked, was capricious and unfair, and that there was very little anybody could do to change any of it.
Whatever happened to me, I knew that life from that day onward would be wonderful to me. I sensed a shift in my mind and I knew I would no longer look or think about anything in the same way as before. That is perhaps the most remarkable long term change I’ve noticed.
The cynicism left me, too. I was done with negativity. I had no idea how I would stop being that way, but even that didn’t concern me. I knew whatever changes I would make would come naturally and at the right time. I don’t know what else to call this but a profound spiritual awakening. The consequences have been bewildering but beautiful.
In one sense, the changes were instantaneous. But, in another way, the awakening initiated a process of change that is still going on to this day. Maybe what I experienced was the very thing I had been telling others about for decades but only vaguely knew about myself. I don’t know and, frankly, I don’t care. Whatever it was, it must surely be what Saint Paul was describing as, ―the renewal of mind.5 Like scores of other people, maybe you, too, I had been a Christian, a believer, for years. But, apart from churchgoing and trying to be a decent church-going person and, later, the best church leader I could be, I cannot say my thinking or living was any more fulfilling or any different than unbelieving people.
As my thinking about everything began changing, however, I started to simultaneously notice a shift in my feelings, too. Almost all the time now, I am at peace. There’s a contentment I feel, and a level of self-acceptance and self-assurance, I’ve never known before. All of this has been supplemented by joy and happiness, qualities of the human experience I had known before, but only ever briefly. Now, however, joy is my normal state of consciousness.
I realize how remarkable, perhaps even unbelievable, all of this must sound to you and, of course, it is. But, it does not mean that my world has become some kind of enchanted fairytale. Nor does it mean that I have achieved a level of spiritual awareness that puts me in the ranks of other spiritual avatars in history. I use words like ―awakening,‖ ―enlightenment,‖ ―redemption,‖ and so on, but only because each of these words contain a picture, an image that describes some little aspect of my otherworldly experience. For me, it’s not unlike a gemologist attempting to describe to a blind person the clarity, cut, as well as the colors, hues, and tones, she might see while observing a multi-faceted diamond. No one word can say it all. But, all of them express something of the Mystery that is inexpressible.
5 Romans 12:1-2